The Queen vs. The Defendant

Cases for Possession of Child Pornography and Luring

R. v. M.P.2025

The client was charged with possession of child pornography and accessing child pornography. The allegation originated from an incident where the client for assistance with his mental health. Because there was a mention of a firearm, police responded. When the police arrived, they began an investigation into possession of child pornography. When they did so, they unlawfully entered his home and searched it without grounds to do so. They then unlawfully arrested him. I reviewed the disclosure in detail. There was significant outstanding disclosure that the prosecutor could not produce. Given the delays and the issues with the violations of the client's rights, I was able to convince the prosecutor to withdraw the charges if the client entered into a peace bond. This left the client with no conviction and no criminal record.

Child Pornography Child Luring

R. v. K.H.2024

The client was charged with possession of child pornography. A search warrant was executed at the client's home . After many months of repeated requests, it became apparent that the prosecutor would be unable to provide me with disclosure in a timely fashion. What's more, the police subsequently charged the client with further charges after reviewing the devices seized. I painstakingly reviewed all of the disclosure, and determined that the prosecution would be unable to prove the allegations against the client, and that there were significant violations of the client's Charter rights. I was able to convince the prosecutor to withdraw the charge in exchange for the client entering into a peace bond. This was an incredible result for a file that would have resulted in the client facing a jail sentence. This left my client no criminal conviction.

Child Pornography
R. v. A.S.2024

The client was charged with importation of child pornography and possession of child pornography. These are very serious charges. I was able to negotiate a resolution with the prosecutor for a specialized peace bond. The client entered into the court order (peace bond) and both charges were withdrawn. This left the client without a conviction and without facing jail time.

Child Pornography Child Luring

R. v. R.D.2021

The client was charged with one count of possession of child pornography and one count of accessing child pornography. This was a unique case where there were other circumstances that made it so that there were concerns on my part that this would not be a case that was in the public interest for a prosecutor to prosecute. I was able to work with the client to help him to help me negotiate with the crown. I was able to have all of the charges dropped (no conviction and no criminal record).

Child Pornography
R. v. R.D.2021

The client was under investigation for a possible criminal charge for possession of child pornography. I provided legal advice to the client. Ultimately, the police did not charge the client so there was no conviction or criminal record.

Child Pornography